Audemars Piguet 25799BC/O/0001VS/01 Features
-
Ref. No. :25799BC/O/0001VS/01
Movement :Manual winding
Case Material :White gold
Condition :0 (unworn)
:New
:With Box
:With Papers
Location :United States, California, Beverly Hills
Price : $ 23,995
Availability
Available immediately
Caliber
Movement :Manual winding
Case
Case Material :White gold
We will arrange the delivery of Audemars Piguet 25799BC/O/0001VS/01 replica as soon as your payment is confirmed. Please make sure that your telephone number and email address are right, because the customer service representatives will contact you and identify your information, in order to deal with the shipments of your order. Generally, we deliver products through EMS, DHL, UPS, etc. And the tracking number will be sent to you via email once the watch is shipped. The shipping fee of any order over $300 is free. The package will be arrived about 7 to 15 days. We accept payment by PayPal, Visa/Master card, Western Union and Bank Transfer. If you pay by Western Union or Bank Transfer, we can offer you 15% off. If you have any questions about shipping and payment, please contact us freely, we'll be glad to help you!
Audemars Piguet 25799BC/O/0001VS/01 The Related Reviews:
- Awesome watch, I like it very much, and I will buy it again, thank you!
- ----
[Rating:(5 / 5 stars)] - Review by ROMIKA MALA Turkiye Istanbul-maltepe from Netherlands Purmerend
- Just was a weird look for Victoria's line.I dont get it, this watch just did not appeal to me.No life in this watch... I would not brag about this at all,sent it back....
- ----
[Rating:(3.5 / 5 stars)] - Review by Jmfitzpatrick Germany Rheinland Pfalz from Netherlands Purmerend
- I like this watch. It looks better than appears in photo. The design is simple yet elegant. Nice size but not bulky. For under $200, it is the best value luxury watch I can find.
- ----
[Rating:(3.5 / 5 stars)] - Review by Jenn C Mexico Ciudad De Mexico from Netherlands Purmerend
Audemars Piguet 25799BC/O/0001VS/01 wrist watches news:
Patrizzi & Co. closed 2009 in New York City with an auction focused on collector-level timepieces offering just 93 lots. The sale generated $4,225,300, with Patek Philippe accounting for more than half the total value. Patrizzi & Co. finishes the year with sales over $34 million from eight auctions in New York, Geneva and Milan. A yellow gold Patek Philippe ref. 2499 Second Series brought the top price at $720,000. Other highlights from the evening include a very rare set of 4 Patek Philippe perpetual calendars, ref. 3970E, produced during the 1990s. The set includes one watch each in yellow, white and rose gold, and one in platinum. Custom dials with diamond indexes compliment each watch, and the original silver dials are also included. The set, which comes with a leather Patek Philippe case, brought $640,000.A yellow gold Patek ref. 2499/100 made and sold in 1990 accompanied by an extract from the archives sold for $320,000.You can view the complete results with images at the
This is the white gold/ardois dial versionSome quickie photos (threw it on a OD cotton NATO for easier posing):
I am trying to sell a couple watches and listed them on Craigslist last night, so this morning I get this response for two of my three watches:"Hi,DO YOU STILL HAVE THE ABOVE ITEM FOR SALE AND ALSO GET BACK TO MEWITH THE TOTAL COST INCLUDING THE SHIPPING THROUGH UPS TO WASHINGTONDCAND ALSO WITH YOUR PAYPAL ACCOUNT for making the payment.THANKS AND I WILL LOOK FORWARD O READ FROM YOU."I emailed back the total with shipping and insurance but omitted my Paypal info. What do you guys think?Have you ever had issue with your PP account?
I like both the ROC 41 mm & the Patek 5035 but can only purchase one. I know one is sporty and the other more of a dress watch but I think they both can be worn dressed up or casual. In terms of value IMO the Patek will retain more value down the line. As for reliability/durability I think the Patek is better. What do other forum members think ? Please chime in.
A new arrival from a trusted seller. It¡¯s been on my list for awhile but held off as I originally thought the Submariner Date was too ¡°common¡±. I started with a white faced Daytona. Then a BLNR as soon as I saw it. It felt a bit too much at first but once I brushed the center links it felt right at home. Then a short lived Explorer 1, the short hands bothered me more than they should have. I traded it for a 5 digit Explorer II which I think is an incredibly underrated watch.And now this... It¡¯s a 2009 5 digit 16610 as I wanted a more subtle look and fit for my thin wrists. I was torn given I knew I was compromising the glidelock but no doubt this will become my daily wearer...







