Invicta Specialty Chronograph Gold Dial Black Rubber Men's Watch 15858

My Timex Expedition WS4 Watch Article On AskMen.com
Yes, I know, I have reviewed this watch before, but that was the full-length Timex Expedition WS4 watch review, not this special version for the AskMenwatches-dealer audience. You'll get another angle on the watch there. The Expedition WS4 is actually proving to be quite the popular timepiece, no joke. With the cool looks, and reasonable price, it is a strong offering from America's own. Check out my Timex Expedition Ws4 article on AskMenwatches-dealer here.

Here, for the GREATEST collection of Illinois EVER assembled
Here:For the greatest selection of Illinois ever assembled:watchtalkforums.info/foru...283#post293283

From SS Daytona to Royal Oak?
Hi, I need your thoughts on this. The SS Daytona has long been a grail for me and I got the white ss daytona two years ago at my local AD. I did enjoyed it for a while but it hasn't been I expected it to be as my number one watch ( like my daily beater) My go to watch. I've been looking at the royal oak 15400(black or white dial) as a replacement. My collection consists of the Pam 233, TT datejust, SS Daytona, Hublot BB and Plat DD. Part of me whats to keep the daytona and part of me wants to flip it just to get the royal oak.People say AP over Rolex anyday. Need your thoughts on this one? thanks

Leather strap for SMP?
Hey guysDoes anyone know where I can get a blue leather omega strap and buckle for my smp? I've done some searching but have come up with almost nothing. Any info is greatly appreciated!

Sub vs Sub date opinion turns into ramble..
I was trying to decide whether to get a Sub or Sub Date and have seen SO many debates on here I thought I¡¯d share my thoughts (for right or wrong. And I know, it¡¯s already been done to death..*yawn*)As far as I can tell it all comes down to these two things:Do you want a date function or not?And do you prefer an older model or new?That¡¯s it. There¡¯s no other arguments to be had and here are a few things that lead me to this conclusion.Firstly, the issue of the date function making it not a ¡®classic¡¯ Rolex.From what I¡¯ve been able to read the date was introduced in 1969 on the 1680 meaning the Sub has had the date for 49 years (only 16 years less than the Sub has been around.)How many years does a feature have to be around before it¡¯s accepted as a classic?Secondly, the dial is more balanced/symmetrical without the date.True but again isn¡¯t this a matter of preference?It¡¯s a design change to add functionality, not just popped in there to mess up the balance.The date window doesn¡¯t make