Baume & Mercier MOAO8524 Features
Ref. No. :MOAO8524
Code :MOAO8524
Movement :Quartz
Case Material :Gold/Steel
Bracelet Material :Gold/Steel
Condition :0 (unworn)
Gender :Ladies' watch
:New
:With Box
:With Papers
Location :United States, New York, Brooklyn
Price : $ 829
Availability
Available immediately
Caliber
Movement :Quartz
Case
Case Material :Gold/Steel
Case Diameter :22 mm
Thickness :6 mm
Waterproof :50 m
Material bezel :Yellow gold
Glass :Sapphire Glass
Dial :White
Dial numerals :Roman numerals
Bracelet
Bracelet Material :Gold/Steel
Bracelet Color :Gold
Clasp :Fold clasp, hidden
We will arrange the delivery of Baume & Mercier MOAO8524 replica as soon as your payment is confirmed. Please make sure that your telephone number and email address are right, because the customer service representatives will contact you and identify your information, in order to deal with the shipments of your order. Generally, we deliver products through EMS, DHL, UPS, etc. And the tracking number will be sent to you via email once the watch is shipped. The shipping fee of any order over $300 is free. The package will be arrived about 7 to 15 days. We accept payment by PayPal, Visa/Master card, Western Union and Bank Transfer. If you pay by Western Union or Bank Transfer, we can offer you 15% off. If you have any questions about shipping and payment, please contact us freely, we'll be glad to help you!
Baume & Mercier MOAO8524 The Related Reviews:
- fast service, good seller
- ----
[Rating:(5 / 5 stars)]
- Review by matt mcmullen Spain Valladolid from Netherlands Purmerend
- Fast shipping, cheap price, great service, really awesome watch, TKS!
- ----
[Rating:(3.5 / 5 stars)]
- Review by Anna Gohgalter Spain Costa De La Calma from Netherlands Purmerend
- Awesome , and fast shipping, A+++service!
- ----
[Rating:(3.5 / 5 stars)]
- Review by beau moore USA Tigard from Netherlands Purmerend
Baume & Mercier MOAO8524 wrist watches news:
Hi everyone, here are some of the new Glycine watches just posted to their site! What do you think?Incursore 46mm.jpgGlycine SUB Stealth.jpgGlycine Sub Golden eye.jpgAirman 17 and 18 2 tone.jpgAirman 12 SST.jpg
70's Dateline
About 10 years ago, I got 3 watches at a yard sale for $15. One was an old Seamaster, one was an Elgin, and the last was a women¡¯s Girard-Perregaux. It wasn¡¯t much to look at. The crystal was scuffed and some of the ¡°gold tone¡± had worn off. It looked a bit 70¡¯s-ish and a bit cheap. I tossed it in a drawer.Reading a little bit on this site has got me wondering though. GP is certainly a venerable marque. Did they go downscale for awhile in the 70s with the advent of quartz movements, or were they able to maintain quality?Looked at carefully, the watch looks like it could actually clean up quite nicely. On close inspection, the case says ¡°Goldplated 20¡± which I assume means 20 microns, so respectable.Thanks to my little $6.99 Buy.com toolkit I was able to get the back off. This reveals a 17-jewel unadjusted movement labeled Girard-Perregaux Gyromatic Swiss on the rotor. The movement is also labeled ¡°866-808¡±, which I assume is the caliber. I have not really been able to find a
I may get some flack for this but why is the jumbo the most coveted royal oak? I know of its horological significance but do people buy this model because of its heritage or because of the way it looks and wears? There may be an impression it may look too plain.For those who currently own this, did its horological value (Genta DNA, etc) outweigh its aesthetics when upon purchasing? Please don't get me wrong. I know this is a FANTASTIC timepiece. Just torn between this or the royal oak chronograph. I fancy the chrono more aesthetically, but I may be missing out on something very important with the 15202.
I mostly wear Rolex but did buy a Pam 104 this year. I liked the look of the watch but sold it b/c it was a bit too big and bulky for me. 42m is about my limit for my wardrobe and the way I dress.I need something on a strap and with rolex the options are pretty limited.Anyone have any thoughts on the Pam 512, 513 or 337? looking at the Panerai site those appear to be smaller and thinner. I like the look of all three of themAny thoughts would be greatly appreciated, I plan on going to the Panerai boutique and trying them on this week.