Longines Saint-Imier Chronographs NEU incl MWST mit Box+Papieren

Omega Speedmaster '57 'Retro Dial' Watch For 2015
It happened only two years ago, at Baselworld 2013, that Omega lunched the Omega Speedmaster '57 Co-Axial, a tribute to the original, pre-Moon-Watch Speedmaster. Now, for 2015, we see a slightly updated version that brings the Omega Speedmaster '57 tribute closer than it has ever been to the Daddy of all Speedmasters. Without further ado, let's see?just how close you can really get in the new millennium to owning the real deal from the mid 20th century.The answer, in short, is: very. We covered the 2013 "re-release" here, and while that appeared to have ticked most of the boxes, Omega managed to inch even closer to the original this time around.?First thing's first, we created the collage that you see above, comparing the 2015 and the 1957 versions.?We must note the obvious: the original's tri-compax sub-dial layout has been replaced with a bi-compax design for the 21st century version, thanks to the 9300 in-house movement ¨C visible through the sapphire caseback ¨C that packs the chrono

Triton hits 2,001!!!
He did it, Larry's posted 2,001 times as of just a bit ago.Way to go, Larry! I'm hot on your heels, bud'.

Guilty for waiting to trade 15400 for DDII?
Should I be feeling guilty for wanting to trade my 15400 for a DDII? Ever since getting a YG Gmt all I want are gold watches.... (once you go gold you never go back?) Killing me as I quite like the waffle dial! Should I be feeling guilty for wanting to trade my 15400? Would you trade a 15400 for a plain old DDII?

POLL: SUBC 114060 vs BLNR 116710 ¡°Batman¡±
If you were going to stay with one watch, which one of these classics would you choose?

Disappointment about Datejust 41
Yesterday I went to an AD as I wanted to buy spontaneously a DJ41 (I thought about a TT black dial with jubilee) as I got a nice bonus and wanted to reward myself.They didn't had it but the gold dial looked good and here it comes... it looked kinda small on my wrist!I was comparing it to my every day watch (116610LN) and the 40mm Sub looked bigger...?Therefore I asked the AD if this are really 41mm and he rolled his eyes and said sir, it's even called Datejust 41.I did some research on this forum and it looks like the Datejust 41 is not even 40mm, it's a bit more than 39mm!I cannot express how angry I am, especially after the sentence from the AD sir it's even called Datejust 41.How do you think about that?+/- 2 sec a day but than being off by that?Please refer to the following posthttps://.rolexforums/showpost...&postcount=130I would appreciate your honest thoughts and feedback.